posted by Thomas on Aug 29

I agree completely with Senator Schumer that McCain’s choice of Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate is a Hail Mary Pass, but it is going to make things very interesting. . . that said, I honestly don’t think they are going to be picking up a lot of women from Senator Clinton’s camp. As Senator Barbara Boxer said, “If John McCain thought that choosing Sarah Palin would attract Hillary Clinton voters, he is badly mistaken. The only similarity between her and Hillary Clinton is that they are both women. On the issues, they could not be further apart.”
For me, it has never been about wanting a woman or wanting someone of color. It has been about who has been the closest to what I am about and what I would like to see happen. Senator Clinton had never been my candidate. I would have supported her as I did Kerry four years ago even though he was not my first choice.
I’m happy that Senator Obama has the nomination. I’m happy that Joe Biden is his running mate. Is he perfect? No. Does he sometimes have a big mouth (yes- and I kind of like that actually) But I’ll stand behind someone with all of the foreign policy experience that he brings plus let us not forget he authored the Violence Against Women Act
Why has McCain (who has a dreadful record on women’s issues) brought Palin to the National Stage? Ann Friedman has a great article in The American Prospect.
It’s clear that Republicans believe that what made Hillary Clinton such a good candidate was her gender, not her political experience or positions on the issues. And McCain’s decision to pick Palin shows he took this message to heart and chose to add her to the ticket primarily because of her gender. In so doing, McCain has turned the idea of the first woman in the White House from a true moment of change to an empty pander.
Why is this a pander? Because Palin is not a woman who has a record of representing women’s interests. She is beloved by extremely right-wing conservatives for her anti-choice record (fittingly, she’s a member of the faux-feminist anti-choice group Feminists for Life). Palin supports federal anti-gay marriage legislation. She believes schools should teach creationism. Alaska is currently considering spending more on abstinence-only sex education. And when it comes to a slew of other issues of importance to women, such as equal pay, she’s not on the record.
Of course, I’m of the belief that more women in politics — across the ideological spectrum — is always a good thing. On a superficial level, nominating a woman to the Republican presidential ticket is indeed a milestone. But the real reason many women were excited about Hillary Clinton’s candidacy is that she was the whole package — a politician with a solid record on issues like choice and fair pay, and with a lot of experience, who was also a woman. Even feminists I disagreed with during the primary made the compelling point that it wasn’t just about Hillary’s gender. It was about her record, too
I really just don’t see a lot of people switching their vote simply because of gender. I hope I’m not wrong, because a McCain/Palin administration would not only be horrible the United States at home and around the world, it would be a disaster for women.